3 ms·
He's written an entire book [0] on how to add notions of causality to the existing algebraic framework for expressing correlation. He alludes to the core idea i
by pjmorris 8y ago
He's written an entire book [0] on how to add notions of causality to the existing algebraic framework for expressing correlation. He alludes to the core idea in the next part of the interview:
"Mathematics has not developed the asymmetric language required to capture our understanding that if x causes y that does not mean that y causes x. It sounds like a terrible thing to say against science, I know. If I were to say it to my mother, she’d slap me."
His home page [1] links to several presentations (e.g. [2]) where he lays out the key ideas.
[0] "Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference", Pearl
[1] http://bayes.cs.ucla.edu/jp_home.html http://bayes.cs.ucla.edu/jp_home.html
[2] http://bayes.cs.ucla.edu/IJCAI99/ijcai-99.pdf http://bayes.cs.ucla.edu/IJCAI99/ijcai-99.pdf
- threatofrain 8y agoWhat about the various concurrency algebras that basically have some composable notion of "happened before"? Aren't these developments at least 30 years old?