2 ms·
I would argue that if you can set aside the pop-culture legacy of the character of Batman--that feeling of "can something this popular be actually good?"--The D
by snowwrestler 8y ago
I would argue that if you can set aside the pop-culture legacy of the character of Batman--that feeling of "can something this popular be actually good?"--The Dark Knight is a better movie than Interstellar.
Interstellar has some beautiful shots and inspiring moments, but I think the plot and characters are not as well-realized. As much as I love the subject matter, I think Interstellar is one of Nolan's weaker films.
- majormajor 8y agoI would put them both more in the middle than most - I hate the magic aspect of the ending of Interstellar, but I also find the Joker's final act uncompelling, especially the boats rigged with explosives - but the aspect of both that I appreciate is a large-scale ambition that's rare these days (but that 2001 also certainly has). Technology has made low-budget ambition still produce high quality results, which is fantastic, but there's also something about what you can do when you throw hundreds of millions at a more audacious concept. I found Dunkirk disappointing because it was (by nature) much more straightforward.