I am in no way saying it has to come from multiple sources. Evidence...no matter how strong or weak, only needs to be legitimate. The whole article awkwardly s

I am in no way saying it has to come from multiple sources. Evidence...no matter how strong or weak, only needs to be legitimate. The whole article awkwardly stresses twice that the argument is without evidence. Which is simply not true. How about the fact Amazon after deductions has paid ZERO federal taxes? Despite billions of dollars in US sales. I pulled those sources up with a quick Google search since I remember reading about it. For a journalist to say or imply the Wall Street Journal published something, and Citibank published something...without evidence is scandalous and false. Trump is merely parroting the news. Says much more about the integrity of the article more than anything else.