4 ms·

Didn't mean to target Musk, but he certainly is in the same area. You ever notice how thin-skinned he is towards criticism and how he's constantly pivoting to p

Didn't mean to target Musk, but he certainly is in the same area. You ever notice how thin-skinned he is towards criticism and how he's constantly pivoting to projects which are years away? Besides the actual lies/exaggerations about Autopilot (people have died because of this), forgive this first title. The important part is the quote: http://www.businessinsider.com/musk-epic-failure-2016-5?op=1 http://www.businessinsider.com/musk-epic-failure-2016-5?op=1 Tesla reported first-quarter earnings last week, and while they were better than Wall Street expected, the earthshaking news that emerged was that Musk is taking the carmaker in a new strategic direction. Tesla, which delivered about 50,000 vehicles last year, is aiming to deliver 500,000 in 2018. The production target isn't new, but the timeline is. Tesla had previously said it would build half a million cars a year by 2020. This did not happen, which led him to Tweet last July that they could deliver 20k cars per month by Dec. This did not happen either. Investors were relieved they managed to hit 2k per week as of March (this is down from the 2.5k they were targeting). https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/881757617416056832 https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/881757617416056832 It's really not a difficult tactic. If you have lots of money you can subsidize lots of failure. The failure ends up ignored, but your 10% hit ratio is looked at as though you're some kind of visionary. You can do that for a long time, if you've got the runway. Holmes will probably be running a very big company in about a decade.

mrep 8y ago
> Besides the actual lies/exaggerations about Autopilot I'm a big Musk fan but Autopilot definitely pisses me off. It's a hugely exaggerated term for laypeople which is why people keep dying on it and I'm highly skeptical they can get full autonomy with their current sensors (and apparently some of his autonomous workers agree which is why they left). You win that round because I agree that is a bullshit promise which will likely be unsolved in its current iteration due to his cop out of "bar regulatory approval". Your other points are all about timelines which I and most others know he always always always underestimates (I don't even know of one that he actually has hit). However, I still feel as though he hits most of those targets eventually and he is definitely moving way faster than other companies towards the hard problems he is trying to solve which is why I don't care nor believe any of his timeline estimates.
mrep 8y ago
>You ever notice how thin-skinned he is towards criticism Don't really notice this. Got any examples (I follow tesla and spacex a lot so I'm probably biased towards backing him)? >How he's constantly pivoting to projects which are years away? Really> His Tesla master plan has been on point. The only spacex big change I can remember is the huge delays to falcon heavy but that was primarily due to falcon 9 capabilities growing by leaps and bounds cannibalizing almost all of the heavy contracts (also, changing falcon 9 capabilities effects falcon heavy design).
- greglindahl 8y ago
  If you go check out /r/enoughmuskspam, you can discover that SpaceX is a failure because they don't have full reusability of Falcon 9 yet, or because they canceled Red Dragon and Grey Dragon, or that BFR is a distraction from the 'fact' that SpaceX is selling commercial launches at a big loss, etc. And then you compare the user list to /r/ula and /r/nasa and various Tesla shorts groups, and you'll find a similar list of usernames. Hmm.

mrep 8y ago

> Besides the actual lies/exaggerations about Autopilot I'm a big Musk fan but Autopilot definitely pisses me off. It's a hugely exaggerated term for laypeople which is why people keep dying on it and I'm highly skeptical they can get full autonomy with their current sensors (and apparently some of his autonomous workers agree which is why they left). You win that round because I agree that is a bullshit promise which will likely be unsolved in its current iteration due to his cop out of "bar regulatory approval". Your other points are all about timelines which I and most others know he always always always underestimates (I don't even know of one that he actually has hit). However, I still feel as though he hits most of those targets eventually and he is definitely moving way faster than other companies towards the hard problems he is trying to solve which is why I don't care nor believe any of his timeline estimates.

mrep 8y ago

>You ever notice how thin-skinned he is towards criticism Don't really notice this. Got any examples (I follow tesla and spacex a lot so I'm probably biased towards backing him)? >How he's constantly pivoting to projects which are years away? Really> His Tesla master plan has been on point. The only spacex big change I can remember is the huge delays to falcon heavy but that was primarily due to falcon 9 capabilities growing by leaps and bounds cannibalizing almost all of the heavy contracts (also, changing falcon 9 capabilities effects falcon heavy design).

greglindahl 8y ago
If you go check out /r/enoughmuskspam, you can discover that SpaceX is a failure because they don't have full reusability of Falcon 9 yet, or because they canceled Red Dragon and Grey Dragon, or that BFR is a distraction from the 'fact' that SpaceX is selling commercial launches at a big loss, etc. And then you compare the user list to /r/ula and /r/nasa and various Tesla shorts groups, and you'll find a similar list of usernames. Hmm.