I don't have to. The burden of proof is on someone who claims that something "almost certainly won't show up", when in fact there are a lot of circumstances wh

I don't have to. The burden of proof is on someone who claims that something "almost certainly won't show up", when in fact there are a lot of circumstances where it definitely will. I'll concede that you might need to look at more than one report to see evidence of this, but I maintain that the ggp is incorrect and I was right to call it "absolutely untrue".