5 ms·
The claim is that it is the same pattern independent of the number of integers per dot.
by _rpd 8y ago
The claim is that it is the same pattern independent of the number of integers per dot.
- ssewell 8y agoIf the numbers of integers-per-dot was set to 1, the sequence would simply highlight prime numbers as they progress through the pyramid shape since “Parallax Compression” would no longer apply.
- gowld 8y agoThe triangle is a hexagon folded onto itself. That's what the "parallax" part is.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- clort 8y agoYet they say that this only seems valid for the number of rows equal to the number of integers-per-dot that was used. So, it would indeed highlight with reasonable certainty all the primes in the first row. (I am not a mathematician but I think that is "1" ?)