4 ms·

The risk of government intervention seems the most likely reason to me. Better to maintain control and relax restrictions on your own terms than risk having the

by jad 16y ago

The risk of government intervention seems the most likely reason to me. Better to maintain control and relax restrictions on your own terms than risk having the terms dictated to you by a judge.

ugh 16y ago
Have there been any recent developments in that respect, though? That also doesn’t do a very good job of explaining the ostensible sudden change. There would have been smoother and more effective ways of communicating that change. Any time Steve Jobs was on a stage in the last few month he could have announced that change and waxed poetically about the importance of developers for Apple.
- ROFISH 16y ago
  There is a non-zero possibility that Jobs simply doesn't want to publicly admit he was wrong.
  - ugh 16y ago
    That’s certainly possible but – if true – pretty petty. Admitting you are wrong when you announce a policy change seems like a great move to me, at least when you are in a position of strength like Apple undoubtedly is at the moment. (Depending on your goals you might not want to admit to making mistakes when you are in a weak position so as to not seem desperate.)
    - RyanMcGreal 16y ago
      Steve Jobs is never wrong. Sometimes the universe is wrong, and he has to compromise, albeit grudgingly and with bad grace.
nonane 16y ago
Another reason, which I find more likely is the market pressure Apple is starting to feel from Android and the slew of new iPad-esque Windows 7 tablet devices coming to market soon (even Windows Mobile 7 is a threat). They need to make sure they can compete on the apps-level with the alternatives.
- Qz 16y ago
  Is Windows Mobile 7 really a threat?
  - nonane 16y ago
    Not yet, but probably it in the future. Microsoft may not have got Windows Mobile right in the last 10 years but they now have a good template to follow (user interface, user experience, even the business model) thanks to Apple. You can see this with Windows Mobile 7 - they've 'rebooted' and are following Apple's lead. They're definitely the underdog but I wouldn't count them out.
    - Gormo 16y ago
      Microsoft is launching Windows Phone 7 with a more restrictive development model than Apple. The OS is just as locked-down as iOS, and as with Apple users are only allowed to install software from the official 'marketplace'; but Microsoft also restricts what license developers are allowed to release software under, and limits how many free applications they can offer without paying additional fees to MS. The one advantage that Microsoft has traditionally had over Apple - the openness of their platforms - has been squandered. Couple that with a featureset that is competitive with the first-edition iPhone, but nowhere matches current iOS and Android devices, and you have a recipe for a flop.

by jad 16y ago

The risk of government intervention seems the most likely reason to me. Better to maintain control and relax restrictions on your own terms than risk having the terms dictated to you by a judge.

ugh 16y ago

Have there been any recent developments in that respect, though? That also doesn’t do a very good job of explaining the ostensible sudden change. There would have been smoother and more effective ways of communicating that change. Any time Steve Jobs was on a stage in the last few month he could have announced that change and waxed poetically about the importance of developers for Apple.

ROFISH 16y ago
There is a non-zero possibility that Jobs simply doesn't want to publicly admit he was wrong.
- ugh 16y ago
  That’s certainly possible but – if true – pretty petty. Admitting you are wrong when you announce a policy change seems like a great move to me, at least when you are in a position of strength like Apple undoubtedly is at the moment. (Depending on your goals you might not want to admit to making mistakes when you are in a weak position so as to not seem desperate.)
  - RyanMcGreal 16y ago
    Steve Jobs is never wrong. Sometimes the universe is wrong, and he has to compromise, albeit grudgingly and with bad grace.

nonane 16y ago

Another reason, which I find more likely is the market pressure Apple is starting to feel from Android and the slew of new iPad-esque Windows 7 tablet devices coming to market soon (even Windows Mobile 7 is a threat). They need to make sure they can compete on the apps-level with the alternatives.

Qz 16y ago
Is Windows Mobile 7 really a threat?
- nonane 16y ago
  Not yet, but probably it in the future. Microsoft may not have got Windows Mobile right in the last 10 years but they now have a good template to follow (user interface, user experience, even the business model) thanks to Apple. You can see this with Windows Mobile 7 - they've 'rebooted' and are following Apple's lead. They're definitely the underdog but I wouldn't count them out.
  - Gormo 16y ago
    Microsoft is launching Windows Phone 7 with a more restrictive development model than Apple. The OS is just as locked-down as iOS, and as with Apple users are only allowed to install software from the official 'marketplace'; but Microsoft also restricts what license developers are allowed to release software under, and limits how many free applications they can offer without paying additional fees to MS. The one advantage that Microsoft has traditionally had over Apple - the openness of their platforms - has been squandered. Couple that with a featureset that is competitive with the first-edition iPhone, but nowhere matches current iOS and Android devices, and you have a recipe for a flop.