2 ms·
I'd say it's got both. It's extremely complex, but it does what it needs so cleanly. I'd argue that it's extraordinarily elegant.
by 0xTJ 8y ago
I'd say it's got both. It's extremely complex, but it does what it needs so cleanly. I'd argue that it's extraordinarily elegant.
- INTPenis 8y agoAnything complex that also does what it's supposed to does of course have some inherent elegance but that doesn't mean I'd call stuxnet elegant. It would be elegant if they could accomplish what they did with less code, relying on fewer exploits and perhaps even without the reliance on stolen private keys from other corporations. Having stolen private keys from hardware vendors is pretty brute force to me.