> Your evaluation of the impact of the law on your project is lazy That seems a very pejorative way to describe it. You can say the same thing in terms of "you

> Your evaluation of the impact of the law on your project is lazy That seems a very pejorative way to describe it. You can say the same thing in terms of "you could probably keep operating if you put a lot of effort into understanding the details of the law" which kind of proves the author's point: this creates work for people and why should someone do that work for no return? Where does the presumption that people owe EU citizens these services at a higher standard than the rest of the world is content (legally) to accept?