2 ms·

The comment I responded to cited environmental regulation. These are oftentimes costly to implement. All regulation costs money to implement. Even if each regul

The comment I responded to cited environmental regulation. These are oftentimes costly to implement. All regulation costs money to implement. Even if each regulation by itself is cheap, these things add up -- it's death by a thousand cuts.

jacquesm 8y ago
> These are oftentimes costly to implement. Yes, but then again: if you don't implement them society as a whole will end up holding the bag. Polluter pays is a very good principle. > All regulation costs money to implement. Yes. But that's called the cost of doing business. And most software based businesses have insane margins anyway because of their ability to scale. > Even if each regulation by itself is cheap, these things add up -- it's death by a thousand cuts. That's one way of looking at it. Another way of looking at it is that it levels the playing field between those that ride roughshot over their users rights and those that try to be nice.
- tathougies 8y ago
  I'm not sure what it is you are arguing about. I am in 100% agreement that regulation is necessary for a functioning society. However, the natural result of introducing new regulation is that some businesses will choose to leave the market. This is the cost of doing business. If a society can bear the loss of the business from the market, then things are good. That's about all there is to it. > Another way of looking at it is that it levels the playing field between those that ride roughshot over their users rights and those that try to be nice. Neither of those viewpoints are in opposition. You can both believe that more regulation kills some businesses through a 'death by a thousand cuts' and that these regulations level the playing field.
  - jacquesm 8y ago
    I'm sure such businesses exist. But this isn't one of them, the article writer is leaving his EU users for reasons all his own, as in: he made them up.
    - tathougies 8y ago
      People are allowed to make up their own opinions, even ones not based in fact, and take actions on things they own regarding them. That is a fundamental human right, last time I checked.
      - sgift 8y ago
        As is calling them out for it (e.g. if they are not based in fact), which is all jacquesm does. That's also a "fundamental human right"
        tathougies 8y ago
        Please don't misinterpret my comments as telling jacquesm to keep quiet. It's a fundamental right to make a fool of yourself. Please continue!

jacquesm 8y ago

> These are oftentimes costly to implement. Yes, but then again: if you don't implement them society as a whole will end up holding the bag. Polluter pays is a very good principle. > All regulation costs money to implement. Yes. But that's called the cost of doing business. And most software based businesses have insane margins anyway because of their ability to scale. > Even if each regulation by itself is cheap, these things add up -- it's death by a thousand cuts. That's one way of looking at it. Another way of looking at it is that it levels the playing field between those that ride roughshot over their users rights and those that try to be nice.

tathougies 8y ago
I'm not sure what it is you are arguing about. I am in 100% agreement that regulation is necessary for a functioning society. However, the natural result of introducing new regulation is that some businesses will choose to leave the market. This is the cost of doing business. If a society can bear the loss of the business from the market, then things are good. That's about all there is to it. > Another way of looking at it is that it levels the playing field between those that ride roughshot over their users rights and those that try to be nice. Neither of those viewpoints are in opposition. You can both believe that more regulation kills some businesses through a 'death by a thousand cuts' and that these regulations level the playing field.
- jacquesm 8y ago
  I'm sure such businesses exist. But this isn't one of them, the article writer is leaving his EU users for reasons all his own, as in: he made them up.
  - tathougies 8y ago
    People are allowed to make up their own opinions, even ones not based in fact, and take actions on things they own regarding them. That is a fundamental human right, last time I checked.
    - sgift 8y ago
      As is calling them out for it (e.g. if they are not based in fact), which is all jacquesm does. That's also a "fundamental human right"
      - tathougies 8y ago
        Please don't misinterpret my comments as telling jacquesm to keep quiet. It's a fundamental right to make a fool of yourself. Please continue!