3 ms·
Yeah, it's odd that they make stronger claims in the middle of the paper (e.g. "This clearly indicates that the “thrust” is not coming from the EMDriv
by catpolice 8y ago
Yeah, it's odd that they make stronger claims in the middle of the paper (e.g. "This clearly indicates that the “thrust” is not coming from the EMDrive but from some
electromagnetic interaction.") than in the conclusion.
- madengr 8y agoWhy not just replace the magnetron with a resistor. That keeps the DC effects while removing the RF. Nevermind, they are not using a magnetron like the original concept.
- vertexFarm 8y agoOh, they did that in a previous emDrive experiment. It still produced the same thrust. They ignored it. This is par for the course with reactionless drive "research."
- Kelbit 8y agoYep. This is going to be the next cold fusion - the device will soon be debunked, but we will still be hearing about it from conspiracy theorists for decades.