3 ms·
AFAICT, it's not a public authority or body (37(1)(a)), it's not "regular and systematic monitoring of data subjects on a large scale" (37(1)(b)) (it seems to b
by stordoff 8y ago
AFAICT, it's not a public authority or body (37(1)(a)), it's not "regular and systematic monitoring of data subjects on a large scale" (37(1)(b)) (it seems to be merely crash reports and minimal information required for the service, not systematic monitoring), nor is it one of the special classes of data (37(1)(c)). I'm not sure how you could could conclude a DPO is necessary.