>We know that some people without access to medical care will die. You're saying it's okay to gamble those people's lives on the chance that future lives might

>We know that some people without access to medical care will die. You're saying it's okay to gamble those people's lives on the chance that future lives might be saved. This happens every time a double-blind medical trial takes place. > as trivial as net neutrality is particularly ridiculous when there are so many other issues where life hangs in the balance. Trivial to you. >is particularly ridiculous when there are so many other issues where life hangs in the balance. If immediacy of life is the sole thing driving your decision behavior, you should quit your job and go help people in developing nations. Some people need to do this. But others also need to focus on longer-term things that promote a better economy that leads to new technologies and surpluses to advance the quality of human life.