24 ms·
It's the "gaining money by threat" part that makes it a plausibly successful charge. What they do is publishing it in a way likely to lead to more publicity, mo
by joshe 8y ago
It's the "gaining money by threat" part that makes it a plausibly successful charge. What they do is publishing it in a way likely to lead to more publicity, more harm to reputation unless you pay them.
Take the Letterman extortion case. Letterman had a relationship with a staffer. Another staffer threatened to disclose to the press unless Letterman paid him. That staffer was convicted.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Halderman https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Halderman
Disclosing to press/public and harming reputation is not extortion. And harming reputation with true facts is totally legal. You can even go to a (trashy) paper and get paid for your story.
Threatening to disclose and/or publicize unless payment is made is extortion.
IANAL and building a case is probably more complicated than I understand.
- jMyles 8y agoYeah, I think you've basically hit the nail(s) on the head here. But it also seems at least partly designed to obscure the fact that parts of pre-trial confinement are tantamount to extrajudicial punishment.