3 ms·
Their CSS is 3.8K while Bootstrap (4.1.1) is 21K. Both being minified and gzipped.
by ddtaylor 8y ago
Their CSS is 3.8K while Bootstrap (4.1.1) is 21K. Both being minified and gzipped.
- ghostbrainalpha 8y agoWould that result in significantly faster page speeds if you switch from Bootstrap?
- Raphmedia 8y agoNo, unless you count milliseconds as significant. You might as well remove one image in your content or save with a better image compression.
- ddtaylor 8y agoIMO an image is much less important than CSS, since most of the time without the CSS framework loading the page is not usable. Also progressive JPEGs make a big difference for the effect of loading time if you have a large splash image or background image.