4 ms·
There is actually appeal to having no indicator: the absense of an indicator doesn’t inadvertently suggest anything about the site’s overall security. The padlo
by ovao 8y ago
There is actually appeal to having no indicator: the absense of an indicator doesn’t inadvertently suggest anything about the site’s overall security. The padlock icon we’re so accustomed to can create a false sense of security, as every other aspect except the connection to all servers may actually be insecure.
You may, for instance, be transmitting credentials that may be stored in plain text, be easily accessible to third-parties or may even be handed directly to black markets. The padlock itself says nothing about any of those details.
A better approach to no icon at all, I think, is simply “secure connection” wording. Trying to distill a lot of complexity and nuance into a single icon is what’s ultimately problematic. It works somewhat well, but not quite well enough.
- RussianCow 8y ago> A better approach to no icon at all, I think, is simply “secure connection” wording. The problem is, most people won't understand the difference between that and just "secure"; arguably, the people who understand what "secure connection" means are those for whom this change doesn't matter.
- ovao 8y agoIt's a fair point. I can't think of any perfect solution, only solutions that are less worse than others at conveying the 'Right Thing'.