4 ms·
"nor did an "AI" cause deaths of humans": Really? In the case of Uber: I can see clearly a man (woman?) absorbed in his cell phone before the crash. What else w
by thelastidiot 8y ago
"nor did an "AI" cause deaths of humans": Really? In the case of Uber: I can see clearly a man (woman?) absorbed in his cell phone before the crash. What else was powering that lane detection system? As for Tesla, the autopilot is not qualifying as AI then what else is these days?
- randomthrowaw3b 8y agoI'm unsure if you're very absorbed into classifying AI as a hostile system that you're missing the speciousness in your own self.. "I can see clearly a man (woman?) absorbed in his cell phone before the crash" So.. regardless of the fact that a human being has caused his own demise, you want to blame "AI" because..? How is an autopilot an "AI"? Planes are stabilized using autopilots so why are you targeting cars over planes? What are you trying to do and what is your point?
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- randomthrowaw3b 8y agoLook.. this is becoming so silly now. If you're fighting for the sake of humans and mitigate traffic accidents, then you should research and fight against drunk driving. Stop trying to attack the wrong cause `just because` you have no clue and feel justified.