4 ms·
> It depends on who you are Correction: it depended on who you are. Those schools have been closed and have been repudiated at the highest levels of the Canad
by Lionsion 8y ago
> It depends on who you are
Correction: it depended on who you are.
Those schools have been closed and have been repudiated at the highest levels of the Canadian government:
> On June 11, 2008, Prime Minister Stephen Harper issued a formal apology, on behalf of the sitting Cabinet, in front of an audience of Indigenous delegates, and in an address that was broadcast nationally on the CBC, for the past governments' policies of assimilation.[78][79] The Prime Minister apologized not only for the known excesses of the residential school system, but for the creation of the system itself. Harper delivered the speech in the House of Commons; the procedural device of a Committee of the Whole was used, so that Indigenous leaders, who were not Members of Parliament, could be allowed to respond to the apology on the floor of the House.
- ficklepickle 8y agoAnd yet the resulting intergenerational trauma lives on. The echoes of these abuses continue long after the abuse itself ends. Lots of similarities, actually. Both systems were designed to destroy a culture seen as backwards by the powers that be.
- Lionsion 8y ago> Lots of similarities, actually. Both systems were designed to destroy a culture seen as backwards by the powers that be. Yeah, except one occurred in the past and is now condemned; the other is a present, newly-created reality.
- danharaj 8y agoThe last school was closed in the far distant year of 1996. Do you really think Canada in 2018 is that far removed from 1996? What exactly happened in that intervening period that will prevent such an atrocity in the future?
- Lionsion 8y ago> The last school was closed in the far distant year of 1996. Do you really think Canada in 2018 is that far removed from 1996? What exactly happened in that intervening period that will prevent such an atrocity in the future? Do you think the school in 1996 was doing the same things as the schools in, say, 1896? Don't you think it's more reasonable to see the 1996 closure as the end (or near the end) of a longer, continuous process, not a binary state change? Unsurprisingly, things are more complicated: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_Indian_residential_school_system#Self-governance_and_school_closure https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_Indian_residential_sc...
- rubatuga 8y agoMaybe the fact that students learn about how horrible it was as part of the curriculum during middle school? Also, the school in 1996 was nothing like the schools in the early 1900s, why would you use that as support?