Would you care to rebut the arguments the blog post puts forth, such as argue that wireguard is actually harder to configure than IPSec or that the protocol is

Would you care to rebut the arguments the blog post puts forth, such as argue that wireguard is actually harder to configure than IPSec or that the protocol is actually less trustworthy? IPsec’s design era, implementation size... really nothing about the thing is even vaguely comparable. Also: wireguard is free and open source software. So what precisely are we (people advocating for it) selling? We paid a hell of a lot more than the cost of an OpenVPN AS license so that everyone could get a macOS client, for free. I don’t make a dime off of you using wireguard. So far 100% of the deployed OpenVPN I’ve seen has had bad crypto. Wireguard just categorically doesn’t have that problem.