4 ms·
Absolutely agree with everything except > On the other hand, it's probably no more inconvenient than locking yourself out... It looks like local control (i.e.
by unit91 8y ago
Absolutely agree with everything except
> On the other hand, it's probably no more inconvenient than locking yourself out...
It looks like local control (i.e., with physical access) wasn't affected, so the only convenience lost was remote access. Not great when you've bought the product specifically for that feature of course, but still much better than locking yourself out.
- fredley 8y agoI can imagine a few people couldn't get into their AirBnBs or whatever until the host schlepped across town, probably ruining their day. But yes, that's the risk of relying on a system as unreliable as the internet for such a task.