3 ms·
You didn't say that talking to people was like computer code, you are describing talking to people like it's computer code so it is relevant. >Also, saying "th
by lovich 9y ago
You didn't say that talking to people was like computer code, you are describing talking to people like it's computer code so it is relevant.
>Also, saying "thank you for making it" isn't answering a question at all, so it isn't "answering a different question".
Saying that you're not lieing because you are haven't said something that is false out of context, but is still misleading _on purpose_ is the most pedantic thing I have heard all year.
And just don't reply if you are going to be done with a discussion, telling people you might not bother replying to them is condescending and uncivil for this board
- nocman 8y ago> You didn't say that talking to people was like computer code, you are describing talking to people like it's computer code so it is relevant. That's your opinion, which I disagree with. So from my view it is still irrelevant. I'm willing to agree to disagree on that point. > And just don't reply if you are going to be done with a discussion, telling people you might not bother replying to them is condescending and uncivil for this board There was nothing uncivil, nor condescending about what I said. I just said I would continue to disagree even if I didn't continue the conversation. I think we've pretty much beaten this disagreement to death, and it's time for me to move on.
- learc83 8y ago>That's your opinion, which I disagree with. So from my view it is still irrelevant. It's not irrelevant just because you disagree with it. That's not what irrelevant means. It would be irrelevant if the truth or falsehood of the statement had no impact on the rest of the argument. >I think we've pretty much beaten this disagreement to death, and it's time for me to move on. Then just move on...stop trying to get the last word in. (I'm not the person you were replying).