4 ms·
> There is no reason to believe intentionally screwing with it's functioning would somehow increase it's ability to perceive the world truthfully. Right, my po
by Pimpus 8y ago
> There is no reason to believe intentionally screwing with it's functioning would somehow increase it's ability to perceive the world truthfully.
Right, my point is that psychedelics are great for exposing falsehood in your thinking, but not necessarily uncovering truth.
> The 'most rational' position lies somewhere in that continuum. When converting to the usual trinary labels, one extreme or the other may end up being the most rational position. The center is not automatically best.
What are you talking about? I think you're misrepresenting my position. I'm nowhere on the continuum, I'm agnostic.
- Numberwang 8y ago“Either the moon is made of cheese or it isn’t” is not a personal belief that should impress anyone.
- spiralx 8y ago"I don't have enough knowledge to make a judgement of whether the moon is made of cheese" is a perfectly valid statement. And if you base your personal beliefs on whether they'll impress other people, then I suspect you're making your own life harder for yourself than it needs to be.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- Pimpus 8y agoAgreed. What's your point?
- enkephalin 8y agojust wanted to say that i don't understand why you are getting downvoted for this. i found your original comment, and especially the blog excerpt quite reasonable.
- chillwaves 8y ago> it sounds like you went from being an atheist to an agnostic. That certainly is a more rational and less dogmatic position to take, based on what we know. Likely because poster is assigning some linear value on metaphysical positions that can not be constrained in such a system. Agnosticism is more rational than Atheism "based on what we know"? Come on now.