3 ms·
The question we want our model to answer matters. Nobody cares whether a superhuman tasting machine can distinguish a red from a white despite food dyes or oth
by SmirkingRevenge 8y ago
The question we want our model to answer matters. Nobody cares whether a superhuman tasting machine can distinguish a red from a white despite food dyes or other trickery. We care whether WE - human beings - can. We care whether we can predict if a wine will taste good to us. We care if we can predict if a wine is high or poor quality. We care if we fail to recognize a bad wine.
We like to believe we can do these things via our tastebuds. We can't. 90% of so-called experts can't either, reliably.
We CAN predict how people (along with those those unreliable experts) will describe and rate wine - based on qualities like color, lore, price, etc - but not taste.
The model for predicting wine quality/affinity is a model based on everything BUT taste. Thats what folks - especially those who've bought wholesale into wine culture - have a hard time with.
Sommeliers are more or less like dowsers, astrologers, or tarot card readers.
- cycrutchfield 8y agoI suggest you spend some time blind tasting wine with a trained sommelier. You will find very quickly that there is an actual methodology being applied and the results are not just randomly-chosen like tarot card readers. It is perhaps not as precise and scientific as we would like, but it is the best we humans can do with our limited abilities of sensory perception. >The model for predicting wine quality/affinity is a model based on everything BUT taste. Frankly, this is reductionist bullshit. But OK, believe what you want to believe.