4 ms·
> Google is kind of saying they can tentatively pass the Turing Test with phones This is quite a bold claim, and one I'm not sure they're making. Their promo m
by aglionby 8y ago
> Google is kind of saying they can tentatively pass the Turing Test with phones
This is quite a bold claim, and one I'm not sure they're making. Their promo material suggests that it's limited to quite well-defined domains where conversations aren't really that open-ended, and we haven't seen how it'll perform in the real world.
Relatedly, I don't think headlines like "Google Duplex beat the Turing test: Are we doomed?" [0] are helpful at all. It's disappointingly low-effort clickbait where instead there's plenty of interesting discussion to be had (should machines have to identify themselves as such? What about their use of pauses and fillers?).
[0] https://www.zdnet.com/article/google-duplex-beat-the-turing-test-are-we-doomed/ https://www.zdnet.com/article/google-duplex-beat-the-turing-...
- computerex 8y agoRight. I personally think the coolest thing about duplex is the end-to-end synthesis of natural speech. The actual call isn't as impressive to me because that's just handed coded stuff. IBM Watson has already had success in this regard.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- ddtaylor 8y agoThey aren't explicitly making the claim, but it seems the premise of their demo was "hey look humans think it's another humans which is somewhat like the Turing Test.