2 ms·
This comment makes way more sense to me that the original blog post. Yes, nobody should be relying upon docker as their distribution platform. That's pretty
by zzzeek 8y ago
This comment makes way more sense to me that the original blog post. Yes, nobody should be relying upon docker as their distribution platform. That's pretty terrible. Ubiquity I've observed seems pretty uncomfortable just supporting the major distros, I actually wrote some docker stuff to pull down their .debs, crack them open and install the binaries inside on a fedora/centos system. That's closed source for ya.
- spookthesunset 8y ago> I actually wrote some docker stuff to pull down their .debs, crack them open and install the binaries inside on a fedora/centos system. Why would you want to do that though? Treat the whole thing as a black box running inside docker and be done with it. The second you crack it open, you get to support it. Let Ubiquiti support it, after all that's what you are paying them the big bucks for.
- zzzeek 8y agobecause....they only offered .deb files and I wasnt running debian or ubuntu (nor do I like to bother with it in containers I'm building myself b.c. i have no clue about debian) the package in question has since finally offered .rpms but i haven't had time / interest in updating it. this is wifi software I'm running personally, ubiquiti only supports the windows/mac versions of it in any case.