3 ms·
At the end of the day it comes down to the fact that businesses just simply don't care (Equifax etc). They like the idea of security and that's where it ends.
by borplk 8y ago
At the end of the day it comes down to the fact that businesses just simply don't care (Equifax etc).
They like the idea of security and that's where it ends.
In many places if you try to "do things right" you will get fired in two months for being too slow/strict and they will happily replace you with a clueless easily trusting person who "goes and fetches things from random third parties".
Many times they get lucky enough to survive and they don't appreciate the risks that they took. That pace becomes the expected norm and sets the theme in the industry.
And when shit hits the fan the PR person writes a "we are oh so very sorry .. security is totally our number one priority" blog post. They blame and fire the poor bastard and replace him with another warm body.
When it comes to these "hidden" things like security companies do not reward and also punish "doing things right" so on average and over the long term we end up where we are today.
When the culture sufficiently shifts towards being sloppy you will get hammered down quick if you try to be the voice of reason because it ends up being you vs everyone else (the norm).
- commandlinefan 8y ago> just simply don't care (Equifax etc). And, honestly, why should they? Security breaches have yet to hurt an actual company (they hurt users plenty, but not the organization that's actually responsible).
- mr_tristan 8y agoData breaches are climbing in cost to organizations. Here's a claim, that in 2017, the average breach costs $3.62 million. https://www.scrypt.com/blog/average-cost-data-breach-2017-3-62-million/ https://www.scrypt.com/blog/average-cost-data-breach-2017-3-... (I've seen similar claims in different ranges. Costs of breaches in the US are pretty high - over $7 million.) Even Equifax probably wants the 3-4 billion in valuation it's lost since the breach. The solution appears to be buying tools to avoid and respond to breaches quickly, instead of engaging and building in security awareness. (Microsoft's security development lifecycle comes to mind.) IMO, both approaches are likely cost effective, though I have no numbers or research to back that up.