3 ms·
I think that's fine because WASM isn't meant to write code in. It's just a source language for other compiled languages. I'm assuming the javascript complaints
by danield9tqh 8y ago
I think that's fine because WASM isn't meant to write code in. It's just a source language for other compiled languages. I'm assuming the javascript complaints you're talking about are because people actually have to write javascript code?
- captainbland 8y agoEven then I don't think they would tie it to the WASM definition that tightly as they intend it to be used on other platforms than just web browsers. It seems to me that you could just have the DOM be expressed as a kind of interface which the browser implements, and then each language just has a DOM library which exposes that interface to the programmer.
- abritinthebay 8y agoRight, I agree but every time someone talks about tighter integration with the browser it really, under the hood, requires DOM access. Because it does basically everything else (or is spec'd to).