3 ms·

Pretty sure scooping .dev violates their "Do No Evil" mandate, especially when after breaking Puma, Pow and a host of other tools, plus forcing HSTS on it in Ch

Pretty sure scooping .dev violates their "Do No Evil" mandate, especially when after breaking Puma, Pow and a host of other tools, plus forcing HSTS on it in Chrome, they don't even offer it for sale.

Jaruzel 8y ago
Google abandoned that mandate years ago.
- astrodust 8y ago
  It's true, the Schmidt Doctrine pretty much threw that out the window.
- deleted 8y ago
  [deleted]
- lern_too_spel 8y ago
  How can it abandon a mandate that never existed? It's "Don't be evil," which has an entirely different meaning. Due to opportunity cost, everything you do can be considered at least a little bit evil, so "Do no evil" is not even possible.
notatoad 8y ago
That's a pretty low bar for "evil"
- astrodust 8y ago
  I suppose they could get the .evil domain, that might lower the bar a bit more.
  - dictum 8y ago
    As with .dev, they'll acquire .evil, thus ensuring no one (else?) can do .evil.
CydeWeys 8y ago
Stay tuned. It's not trivial to launch a new gTLD. No evil involved, just work.