3 ms·
The performance comparisons between gc and non-gc languages show otherwise. Also, memory consumption eventually costs cpu cycles.
by PSeitz 8y ago
The performance comparisons between gc and non-gc languages show otherwise. Also, memory consumption eventually costs cpu cycles.
- kjeetgill 8y agoI'm not really disagreeing with you, performance comparisons between gc and non-gc languages DO tend show otherwise, but consider this: a common GC strategy in C++ is arena allocation. Faster allocations and deallocations but more memory overhead. It's still C++ but a little faster in the right situation.