3 ms·
This seems to be more of a story of a flawed interview process. The author claims all the interviews when very well. This suggests their questions are not subst
by venuur 8y ago
This seems to be more of a story of a flawed interview process. The author claims all the interviews when very well. This suggests their questions are not substantive enough to actually distinguish an experienced candidate from others. Alternatively, the “catfish” was amply qualified and faked references for reasons not discussed in the article.