3 ms·
I guess pragmatism is valid, but there were quite a few half-baked modules tossed in there just to make it look like the toolkit was more comprehensive than it
by menloparkbum 19y ago
I guess pragmatism is valid, but there were quite a few half-baked modules tossed in there just to make it look like the toolkit was more comprehensive than it really was. Also, I think openACS expunged them, but in the initial releases at least 25% of the code was dedicated to Philip's rambling comments about how a particular function would be much more elegant in common lisp.
- mechanical_fish 19y agothere were quite a few half-baked modules tossed in there just to make it look like the toolkit was more comprehensive than it really was. Has there ever been an open source toolkit that didn't look like this? I assure you that Drupal is just the same, only the half-baked modules are numbered in the thousands... Your statement about Philip's rambling comments is both ROTFL-funny and 100% believeable. ;) Hey, just because you're being a pragmatist doesn't mean you can't complain about it at great length...
- menloparkbum 19y agoYeah, I've worked with Drupal, it is far worse. However, new things like Rails, Merb, even Django suffer from this far less.