4 ms·
this is interesting heuristic guidance on taxes, but this doesn't describe labor or contract law, as far as i can tell. your link even notes: > There is no “m
by abiox 8y ago
this is interesting heuristic guidance on taxes, but this doesn't describe labor or contract law, as far as i can tell.
your link even notes:
> There is no “magic” or set number of factors that “makes” the worker an employee or an independent contractor, and no one factor stands alone in making this determination. Also, factors which are relevant in one situation may not be relevant in another.
- Clubber 8y agoHere is some more. It's considered tax evasion. https://legal.uncc.edu/legal-topics/contracts/contract-checklist/independent-contractor-rules-thumb https://legal.uncc.edu/legal-topics/contracts/contract-check... https://www.consumeraffairs.com/news/employers-must-follow-strict-rules-for-independent-contractors-011315.html https://www.consumeraffairs.com/news/employers-must-follow-s... https://www.reuters.com/article/businesspropicks-us-findlaw-dont-treat-c/dont-treat-contractors-like-employees-idUSTRE53063S20090401 https://www.reuters.com/article/businesspropicks-us-findlaw-...
- matte_black 8y ago> “You are not an independent contractor if you perform services that can be controlled by an employer -- what will be done and how it will be done, the IRS rule says. “This applies even if you are given freedom of action. What matters is that the employer has the legal right to control the details of how the services are performed.”