If I understand correctly, you're supporting my point. Free speech is very much about allowing someone to act like a jackass (or worse!) to people with words a

If I understand correctly, you're supporting my point. Free speech is very much about allowing someone to act like a jackass (or worse!) to people with words and ideas. It doesn't protect those speakers from the repercussions. Trigger warnings aren't repercussions, however. They're prior restraint, and that's a no-no.