4 ms·
There's even wild differences between macroorganisms on Earth. Invertebrates are much more relaxed about number of eyes etc. We can go from "humans are the op
by hyperpallium 8y ago
There's even wild differences between macroorganisms
on Earth.
Invertebrates are much more relaxed about number of eyes etc.
We can go from "humans are the optimal form!", to "well, some kind of mammal", "c'mon, it's got to be a vertebrate", then get into the Cambrian experiment, go back further to different DNA (RNA anyone), then to different metabolic pathways, then to different organic biochemistry, then to non-carbon... and why should life have a chemical basis, anyway? So chemocentric.
How can we tell when he go from too anthropocentric to too anti-anthropocentric? We have guesswork only. We're like a child rebelling against its parents.
It seems to me, that elephants, dolphins, parrots, octipuses, and even spiders could have undergone the rapid brain-size increase that happened to some apes. (We don't even know why it happened to us.) They might still do so, in a few million years.
- Consultant32452 8y agoOn the other hand, some physical features have evolved multiple times independently. The eye is one key example. IMO this is a strong indication that creatures that evolved in places other than Earth probably also have something we'd recognize as eyes.
- hyperpallium 8y agoYes, a great procedure for getting parameters. Note that some earth creatures - deep sea and underground - have almost lost eyes. Like [blind mole rats](https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Spalax https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Spalax). They have appropriately alien-like nose-antennae. If there's light, they'll have eyes. Probably.