3 ms·
well you don't need this stuff until you do - some things still need definite, analytical performance guarantees. I'd be pretty nervous riding an airplane that
by Jack000 8y ago
well you don't need this stuff until you do - some things still need definite, analytical performance guarantees.
I'd be pretty nervous riding an airplane that didn't use modern control theory, or going over a bridge that didn't use FEA - or an self-driving car that ran on a raspberry pi instead of a RTOS...
- ItsMe000001 8y agoWhy do you think in absolutes? I'm tempted to cite a certain Dilbert... but that would make me appear incredibly rude, which I really don't want to be. Of course it is easy to find examples where it's needed, and it is easy to see so too. So? Did I propose at any point "Nobody needs higher math for anything" or something similar? I don't see a need to argue about an argument never made.