3 ms·
I completely agree. However, crypto doesn't abide by warrants. So many people read into my comment thinking that I'm supporting a surveillance state. I am not.
by notheguyouthink 8y ago
I completely agree.
However, crypto doesn't abide by warrants. So many people read into my comment thinking that I'm supporting a surveillance state. I am not. I simply am talking about how it is, indeed, complicated.
Crypto doesn't care about warrants. The problem is complicated.
The fact that you can even talk about warrants in a crypto conversation sort of irks me to be honest. Warrants are meaningless in crypto conversations. Not just meaningless, but incompatible.
Don't argue points I'm not trying to make please. I'd delete my original comment if I could -_-
- kennywinker 8y agoCrypto doesn't respect warrants, but if the government can't break your crypto, they can still install a physical keylogger - provided they go get a warrant. Warrants aren't relevant if we're talking about crypto, but warrants are relevant if we're talking about surveillance.