3 ms·
> The counterargument is that you are welcome not to do business with companies that require you to accept such a condition While you are right, it's not reaso
by ProAm 8y ago
> The counterargument is that you are welcome not to do business with companies that require you to accept such a condition
While you are right, it's not reasonable for any person to assume they are waiving their rights to legal action if you are raped by using a transportation service for merely clicking on 'Accept' to the EULA.
- PurpleBoxDragon 8y ago>they are waiving their rights to legal action The criminal matter can still be reported and dealt with the normal way, no? Isn't what is being waived is suing a third party for employing the accused (specifically, suing for negligence in employing the accused when they shouldn't have)?
- ProAm 8y agoExcept Uber executives have interfered in rape incidents with their drivers in the past, this should not be forced into arbitration. [1] In most cases I feel the company will be found not at fault, but feel it's the customers right to sue and lose. [1] https://www.recode.net/2017/6/7/15754316/uber-executive-india-assault-rape-medical-records https://www.recode.net/2017/6/7/15754316/uber-executive-indi...
- gowld 8y agoThat's a different crime (obstruction of justice) and a different tort (Uber office/management vs victim, not driver vs victim), not covered by the EULA.