2 ms·
This document is 10 years old, and even then it acknowledged that finding shells without function support is a tough ask. You're not practically right, either.
by Sir_Cmpwn 8y ago
This document is 10 years old, and even then it acknowledged that finding shells without function support is a tough ask. You're not practically right, either.
When a system does not (correctly) implement portable standards, it is a bug in the system and software should not be corrected to accomodate for it. autotools disagrees with me on this point.
- anothergoogler 8y agoYea, I'm going to side with autotools' maintainers on matters of software portability. And because I'm not aiming for autotools-levels of portability, I just write v3-compatible Bash, to help out my GPL2 OSX friends.