4 ms·
The Idea That Women Are Cyclical Cuckolders Bites the Dust
- maerF0x0 8y ago"Dear Editor: Once again this Journal has published research supposedly supporting a null hypothesis on the basis of null-results. Even a large-scale study, laid out carefully, cannot support the notion that a phenomenon or relationship does not exist. A null result is no result at all. Please preserve the integrity and reputation of Psychological Science. Erhard Eimer PhD Professor Emeritus of Psychology APS Member" https://www.psychologicalscience.org/news/releases/womens-preference-for-masculine-faces-not-linked-with-hormones.html#comment-8358848 https://www.psychologicalscience.org/news/releases/womens-pr...
- vivekd 8y agoIt might be more accurate to say that previous studies showing a relationship between sexual preference and menstrual cycles are not reproducible. I think they just put it in more layperson's terms. The economist headline is naturally more sensationalized being a popular press article, but the physiological science headline starting with "no evidenced that. . . " is okay enough to pass imo.
- ericschmidt 8y agoNot really, if anything this article just promulgates the idea that women are permanent cuckolders if you lack high-testosterone facial morphology. The incels are right lol