3 ms·
Pity they can't compete with capitalist owned and run corporations. I would love for them to work, but they all seem to end up failing [0]. 0. Yes I know there
by danieltillett 8y ago
Pity they can't compete with capitalist owned and run corporations. I would love for them to work, but they all seem to end up failing [0].
0. Yes I know there are the odd exceptions, but these are so rare they almost prove the point.
- meheleventyone 8y agoIsn't the question whether or not they fail at a higher rate than more traditional corporations? For example many fewer employee owned companies started is going to make the successful look exceptional even if they are more likely to succeed.
- danieltillett 8y agoIf fewer employee owned companies are started it just means the failure is upfront.
- meheleventyone 8y agoIf you want to know relatively which does better you need to compare success in each population. There are a lot of confounding factors in why different types of companies are founded. Saying that less employee owned companies are started is evidence of failure is at best a very shaky understanding of how to look at the business landscape.