That was an interesting read. After reading both that and the other comments the only solid conclusion I can come to is that literary and visual intellectual pr

That was an interesting read. After reading both that and the other comments the only solid conclusion I can come to is that literary and visual intellectual property are handled differently, as evidenced by thid quote from the paper: Judge Castillo stated that “[b]ecause the Seventh Circuit’s incremental expression case law focuses on images rather than literature, it is difficult to apply its precedent seamlessly.”