5 ms·
I agree with you 100% It basically comes down to tradition, ubiquitousness, and stubbornness. Which is sad to me. We fix other stuff. If an exploit appears in
by tokyodude 8y ago
I agree with you 100%
It basically comes down to tradition, ubiquitousness, and stubbornness. Which is sad to me. We fix other stuff. If an exploit appears in the OS it gets patched. Yet here we have a system that basically defaults to bad behavior, un-secure. It should be redesigned/replaced with something that makes it hard to do it wrong. If not replacing then maybe adding a "safe" mode and slowly deprecating the non-safe way. Sure it may take years. So did moving from python 2 to 3 but it is happening.
Maybe it will take the powers-that-be to start having their data stolen though shell exploits to realize if they made the shell hard to get wrong by default they'd be helping themselves as well?