3 ms·
No reason to oversimplify and ignore a lot of important details — they're doing that for you!
by brockf 8y ago
No reason to oversimplify and ignore a lot of important details — they're doing that for you!
- cs702 8y agoThe original link was to the actual paper[a], not the blog post! A moderator, dang, changed the link after I posted my comment; see his comment [b] elsewhere in this thread. Had the original link been to the blog post, I agree, there would have been no need to simplify. [a] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-018-0147-8 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-018-0147-8 [b] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17068449 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17068449
- alex_duf 8y agoI'm quite happy with the blog post, I don't have enough background to understand the paper