3 ms·
You may be getting downvoted for snark and hyperbole, and that wouldn't be unfair, but it might be Germany's exemplary use of renewable energy that makes the ho
by i_am_nomad 8y ago
You may be getting downvoted for snark and hyperbole, and that wouldn't be unfair, but it might be Germany's exemplary use of renewable energy that makes the host country relevant.
- sydney6 8y agoShare of energy from renewable sources 2004-2016: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=File:Figure_1-Share_of_energy_from_renewable_sources_2004-2016.png http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?... edit: explanation.
- vcpnt51 8y agoI think I raise a very good point. What good is a chat server if it's censored?
- amaccuish 8y agoI think you mean, in this case, what good is a chat server "if I can't post my third reich gifs?". *I was mainly answering your parent which is now flagged, with the contempt it deserves... :)
- nothrabannosir 8y agoAnd you’re almost raising it properly, to boot. All you need now is to drop the rhetorical question and add a link to help those unfamiliar with the event you’re referring to, and you’re all set for upvotes. Don’t forget to frame it like a question and emphasise your neutrality: “This does seem impressive from a technological standpoint, and I fully support the initiative. However, is anyone else reminded of The Event on Day X?[0][1] I would wager this does put a damper on the credibility of this entire project. Or am I wrong?” [0] putin.ru/i-am-right [1] google Seriously, though. Rhetorical questions and vague references may work well in person but they carry over very poorly on an Internet forum. Please, just get to the point. (P.s. I’d be lying if I said this isn’t basically how I actually post here)