2 ms·
People have experimented with this and it's not very popular en masse. A workable model might be something akin to a subscription service wherein you get 200 a
by nkozyra 8y ago
People have experimented with this and it's not very popular en masse.
A workable model might be something akin to a subscription service wherein you get 200 articles a month from WSJ/NYT/Bloomberg/Whoever for $10 and the revenue is distributed equitably after the provider cut.
- martinald 8y agoI would definitely pay for this. Economist, WSJ, NYT, Bloomberg, FT would cost about $200/month for a full subscription to each. I don't read any of them that much to justify that sort of money, but if it was 10-20 for a bunch of articles across them all a la spotify I'd definitely pay for it. I think most people I know would too. However, they are probably concerned about cannibalising their own subscriptions too much to do it, which sucks.