3 ms·

Ironically it is going to be easiest for places with the cleanest power (hydro, nuclear, geothermal, wind) because clean power tends to be non-burstable while f

Ironically it is going to be easiest for places with the cleanest power (hydro, nuclear, geothermal, wind) because clean power tends to be non-burstable while fossil fuels are. So in places like France or Ontario what will happen is that the cars will automatically charge when rates are low (at night) and may even help the grid by acting as remote batteries. For example, you could keep your car at a 70% minimum charge as a configuration then allow the power grid to pull from you as needed. This would passively reduce your overall power bill as you're selling at peak demand and buying at peak supply.

y4mi 8y ago
while also depleting the battery's lifespan. sounds like a perfect opportunity to get careless car owners to destroy their own property for a company's revenue. especially hilarious if the car owner doesn't use an expensive UPS between the grid and the car. I'm sure the next lightning storm isn't too far off - and some of the plugged in cars won't survive it. I'm not against EV though. There'll however be a lot of growing pains as they take over the cities. (though thats still far off)
- NeutronStar 8y ago
  Look at the batteries lifespan, it's like 25 years. Go look at data before spewing nonsense.
  - y4mi 8y ago
    li-ion battery lifespans are generally calculated in power cycles. They don't really age with years... Generally, power cells have about 300-500 power cycles until there is a significant drop in performance. This is one of the major faults of EV that is often quoted, as some parts of the batteries aren't recycled. So, you're essentially trading the co2 pollution to toxic waste. maybe you should check the facts before you spout nonsense yourself?
    - NeutronStar 8y ago
      > But, overall, the data offer some basis for confidence that a Tesla Model S will lose—on average—less than 15 percent of its battery capacity over the average 150,000-mile (250,000-km) life of a vehicle. https://www.greencarreports.com/news/1110149_tesla-model-s-battery-life-what-the-data-show-so-far https://www.greencarreports.com/news/1110149_tesla-model-s-b... > maybe you should check the facts before you spout nonsense yourself? Maybe you should?
  - skellera 8y ago
    You can correct someone while being civil. We don’t need people being jerks to each other.
- 3pt14159 8y ago
  This can be modelled with net present value accounting. If, at scale, it is financially worth it for Tesla to manufacture giant batteries for the electric grid then it will also be financially viable for the electric grid to use spare battery capacity.
monkeynotes 8y ago
Distributed grid battery storage via EVs is an interesting idea and I'd think a 70% charge would be possible for commuters. However, when everyone gets home plugging in to get back what they supplied out during the day I am curious to see how the network would deal with that load. Imaging Toronto with 25% of households consuming an additional 20kwh a day, that's a considerable change. Apartments in Toronto probably use about 18-25kwh a day on average, you'd essentially be doubling that for a quarter of the city. I'd love to know if that's manageable / what industry experts are thinking. (My numbers are all backed by very crappy quick internet searches and guestimates)

y4mi 8y ago

while also depleting the battery's lifespan. sounds like a perfect opportunity to get careless car owners to destroy their own property for a company's revenue. especially hilarious if the car owner doesn't use an expensive UPS between the grid and the car. I'm sure the next lightning storm isn't too far off - and some of the plugged in cars won't survive it. I'm not against EV though. There'll however be a lot of growing pains as they take over the cities. (though thats still far off)

NeutronStar 8y ago
Look at the batteries lifespan, it's like 25 years. Go look at data before spewing nonsense.
- y4mi 8y ago
  li-ion battery lifespans are generally calculated in power cycles. They don't really age with years... Generally, power cells have about 300-500 power cycles until there is a significant drop in performance. This is one of the major faults of EV that is often quoted, as some parts of the batteries aren't recycled. So, you're essentially trading the co2 pollution to toxic waste. maybe you should check the facts before you spout nonsense yourself?
  - NeutronStar 8y ago
    > But, overall, the data offer some basis for confidence that a Tesla Model S will lose—on average—less than 15 percent of its battery capacity over the average 150,000-mile (250,000-km) life of a vehicle. https://www.greencarreports.com/news/1110149_tesla-model-s-battery-life-what-the-data-show-so-far https://www.greencarreports.com/news/1110149_tesla-model-s-b... > maybe you should check the facts before you spout nonsense yourself? Maybe you should?
- skellera 8y ago
  You can correct someone while being civil. We don’t need people being jerks to each other.
3pt14159 8y ago
This can be modelled with net present value accounting. If, at scale, it is financially worth it for Tesla to manufacture giant batteries for the electric grid then it will also be financially viable for the electric grid to use spare battery capacity.

monkeynotes 8y ago

Distributed grid battery storage via EVs is an interesting idea and I'd think a 70% charge would be possible for commuters. However, when everyone gets home plugging in to get back what they supplied out during the day I am curious to see how the network would deal with that load. Imaging Toronto with 25% of households consuming an additional 20kwh a day, that's a considerable change. Apartments in Toronto probably use about 18-25kwh a day on average, you'd essentially be doubling that for a quarter of the city. I'd love to know if that's manageable / what industry experts are thinking. (My numbers are all backed by very crappy quick internet searches and guestimates)