4 ms·
Mumbling Is a Clever Data-Compression Trick
- stevebmark 9y agoHave you noticed how Nautilus regularly reaches the front page, more often than any other domain, but has disproportionately fewer comments than the articles around it?
- yorwba 9y agoThis article currently has 15 upvotes after 3 hours. Most Nautilus articles don't get that far: https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=nautil.us https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=nautil.us The number of comments is also roughly in line with the number of votes. I don't think there's anything special going on besides dnetesn reading everything Nautilus puts out and then submitting it to HN.
- polarix 9y agoClearly they just always write everything that needs to be said on a topic!
- stevebmark 9y agoIt should be obvious: These articles are put here artificially. They are low quality content with low engagement, and a significant outlier in terms of normal HN content. Even the articles themselves get no comments on their native Disqus plugin.
- gremlinsinc 9y agoI love nautilus articles for about the first 40-50%..then I get bored cause they provide too much info, lol. I end up moving on, plus they're more 'info' related than controversial so there's really less to discuss about them usually than say something about global warming. I think the length and fullness of articles might make it so people are less prone to leave comments. I only checked on this one because I was curious what others thought of humans using natural compression techniques on language.
- combatentropy 9y agoLinguists continue to refute the grammarhounds. Oh there's a good reason for double negatives, split infinitives, ain't, and mumbling. I'm okay with most of that, though I feel a bit ill at ease with total licentiousness. Anyway, what if one day we find a neurological or sociological justification for being a grammarhound?