4 ms·
> Having a darknet software that circumvents copyright restrictions won't prevent a squad of guys with guns appearing at your doorstep and taking you to a place
by wolfgke 8y ago
> Having a darknet software that circumvents copyright restrictions won't prevent a squad of guys with guns appearing at your doorstep and taking you to a place
That is why I wrote "darknet software". If the software cannot ensure anonymity, you get this kind of problem.
> To prevent that, you need another solution and the answer is not technology or software.
Sure, but until a solution appears, better create technology and software that makes civil disobedience easy.
- vetinari 8y agoIn case of movies/tv shows/music/etc, which you do not need to live, much better solution is to ignore the existence of the movies/tv shows/music/etc produced by companies that abuse whatever you believe. That will get you much further (see? the market is not interested at all, why do they need that law?), than making them a victim and giving them a reason to push for much more draconian laws.
- wolfgke 8y ago> In case of movies/tv shows/music/etc, which you do not need to live, much better solution is to ignore the existence of the movies/tv shows/music/etc produced by companies that abuse whatever you believe. I already do, so to me this is nothing even worth talking about. :-) The problem rather lies, for example, in the "cultural" references that people use all the time. > than making them a victim and giving them a reason to push for much more draconian laws. I tell you: You can do what you want - they will make you a victim in any case. In this sense I do not just ignore their movies etc., but also ignore their rights to have a right to censor (copyright), too. I am against violence, so I am against copyright, too.