3 ms·
Java users in the enterprise like myself in some of my client work won't be massively enthralled by this approach, though not necessarily for good reasons. Audi
by Hallucinaut 8y ago
Java users in the enterprise like myself in some of my client work won't be massively enthralled by this approach, though not necessarily for good reasons. Audit and compliance teams love to pick up on software versions not on the latest version, so the idea of having a six month churn just means I can see man-months of effort being plowed into no-op changes.
We're also unlikely to benefit since vendor software can't upgrade (or won't certify new versions) and the mannequin developers consultancies place offshore can barely work with Java 1.4 concepts. Best I can hope for is improvements in GC and better defaults.
- zaphirplane 8y agoWeird, why ? So long as the version is supported, compliance doesn’t raise the issue. Of course plenty of compliance is done by recent graduates working for big accounting firms
- sk5t 8y agoSecurity updates to the JVM/JRE.
- zaphirplane 8y agoThe complaint was about the affect of major version release frequency. Security fixs are done in bug fixes release