Two "might" occurrences means it's unlikely. The chances are these people will be swallowed by whatever the most profitable industry is at the time. My guess w

Two "might" occurrences means it's unlikely. The chances are these people will be swallowed by whatever the most profitable industry is at the time. My guess would be similar learning systems that aren't subject to GDPR, such as government, external to EU (US), the ludicrous information of things (smart sensors, cloud, etc) where information doesn't leave the user's control, AI driven products, etc. Then you'll have quite a few who will just continue regardless, sometimes it's easier to apologize (and pay a small fine) than it is to ask for permission. Don't get me wrong, I would love for all of these people to end up in the (Scientific) health industry. (It's worth mentioning Scientific, as there is a lot of useless crap that uses some form of learning and offers no real gain - would be disappointing to see them all end up applying deep learning to homeopathy for example.)